See more on this in the Internet Explorer section below.
One thing to note: VMware Fusion was several times slower than Parallels Desktop in the Internet Explorer tests (across the board), so we removed IE from the overall analysis to avoid skewing the overall results. (Note: This is not intended to be read, but to give you an overview of resultsīy coloring. (Note: Not all tests were run on all configurations, hence the empty cells.)įigure 2: Test Results Matrix with Coloring Darkest coloring means faster by 10% or more, medium coloring indicates 1-10% difference, and lightest coloring means less than 1% difference. Blue cell coloring indicates VMware Fusion was faster than Parallels Desktop. Green cell coloring means Parallels Desktop was faster than VMware Fusion.
(Compares 3 types of VM launch times, compression, and transcoding MP3.)Īnother way to look at this is the color-coding on the results matrix.
#Parallels vs vmware windows
(Comparing 3 types of VM launch times, compression, transcoding MP3, 3 types of application launches, and 3 application performance tests.)įor 64-bit Windows Vista, running under two virtual processors, Parallels Desktop runs 15% faster than VMware Fusion. (Comparing 3 types of VM launch times, compression, transcoding MP3, 7 types of file and network IO, 3 types of application launches, and 3 application performance tests.)įor 32-bit Windows OSes, running under two virtual processors, VMware Fusion runs XP 10% faster than Parallels Desktop, and Parallels Desktop runs Vista 20% faster than VMware Fusion. VMware Fusionįor 32-bit Windows OSes, running under a single virtual processor (the default when you create virtual machines in either product, and therefore, the most commonly used configuration), Parallels Desktop runs both XP and Vista 14% faster than VMware Fusion. (Note: In all cases except battery life, when looking at the graphs in this article, take note that shorter bars are better.)įigure 1: Overall Results, Parallels Desktop vs. Here are the overall conclusions, but you should really look at more of the detail to understand what works best for you. The one exception is for those that need to run Windows XP, 32-bit on 2 virtual processors, VMware Fusion runs about 10% faster than Parallels Desktop. In the majority of overall averages of our tests, Parallels Desktop is the clear winner running 14-20% faster than VMware Fusion.
#Parallels vs vmware for mac
VMware Fusion (cont.) How do VMware Fusion and Parallels Desktop for Mac stack up?īy Neil Ticktin, Editor-in-Chief/Publisher Overview VMware FusionĬolumn Tag: Virtualization Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. Head-to-Head: Parallels Desktop for Mac vs. Educational Institution and Student Discounts.
0 kommentar(er)
